Mitt Romney Referred To Obamacare As A Tax

Many Others Do As Well

Barack Obama

Republican presidential challenger, Mitt Romney, referred to U.S. President Barack Obama's health care plan, dubbed Obamacare, as a tax. This assessment is based on the financial terms of the program. Each person in America will be required to pay several hundred dollars per year or a percentage of their income for health insurance, as a tax, as ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court. It's the only way the Supreme Court, now apart of the Obama Administration, could get the bill passed. However, President Obama doesn't care for the tax label.

The Judiciary Report is of the belief, America needs a health care program, but the proposed terms will prove insufficient in many cases to offset the cost of medical treatment. For example, when I became deathly ill due to the criminal harassment in this case, over the course of one year, between 2008 to 2009, my medical bills totaled roughly$100,000. This was due to the amount of medical scanning that was done. The Obamacare yearly fee wouldn't have even covered the cost of my hospital room for four days.  

Mitt Romney

The American medical system is one of the most expensive in the world and needs to find a way to reduce the cost of scanning/imaging. So many people undergo at least one type of scan per year at a hospital, which will exceed the equivalent of one year's Obamacare fees. The cost of medication needs to decrease as well, as some pharmaceutical companies simply charge too much money for their products. It often takes pharmaceutical companies a few pennies to manufacture each pill and as the ingredients are often not expensive, the massive mark up is purely for huge profits.

Obamacare will not solve America's health woes, just increase the deficit by trillions of dollars, in acts the nation can't afford and suffer from financial shortages, rather than surpluses. America needs  a solid health care program and if necessary, legislative measures to address the pharmaceutical and medical equipment manufacturing industries. A handful of well connected companies are making many billions per year, while the American people pay a terrible price for it.     

STORY SOURCE

Romney: Individual mandate "is a tax"

RELATED ARTICLES

President Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder Should Have Resigned

Contempt Of Congress Hearings To Proceed In The Legislature Against Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder

Report: The FBI Has Been Beating, Torturing And Threatening To Kill American Citizens If They Will Not Become Snitches (Informants)

Attorney General Eric Holder Told To Resign In Condemnatory Speech Aimed At His Corruption

More Evidence Surfaces Implicating Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder In Serious Crime

New Book On The Fast And Furious Scandal Implicates Eric Holder And The FBI In A Cover Up That Killed U.S. Agents

120 Congresspeople Call For The Resignation Of Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder

President Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder Connected To Banks Responsible For The Mortgage Crisis

Eric Holder A Massive Liability To Obama In The 2012 Election

Obama Being Accused Of Using Attorney General Eric Holder To Rig The 2012 Presidential Election

91 Members Of Congress Demand The Resignation Of Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder

73 Members Of Congress Sign A Vote Of No Confidence Against Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder Due To 'Fast And Furious' Deaths

Lauryn Hill Pleads Guilty To Tax Evasion And Faces Potential Prison Sentence

Lauryn Hill before her fall from grace, won many Grammy Awards

R&B singer Lauryn Hill, earned millions of fans and dollars as the front woman for the successful trio the Fugees. However, she is in the dock this week for not paying her income taxes in the United States of America. Hill pled guilty to tax evasion, regarding the time period between 2005-2007, when she earned $1,800,000 and did not pay a dime to the U.S. Treasury in taxes. 

Hill has struggled with mental illness during the past few years, under the tutelage of a guru descried as a charlatan that also led comedian Dave Chapelle astray

She faces a possible prison sentence for this offense. America is bankrupt and the I.R.S. has been clamping down on tax cheats in a bid to boost income to the Treasury. A number of Hollywood stars and the main cult in Hollywood, Kabbalah, have been engaging in tax evasion, scams and financial rip-offs, designed to cheat the government.

RELATED ARTICLES 

 Confirmed: Kabbalah Is Under Criminal Investigation

Report: Kabbalah Cult Under Grand Jury Investigation

Madonna And Kabbalah Close Their Corrupt Charity Due To Criminal Investigation

Madonna Fraudulent Charity For Africa Squanders Millions On Big Salaries & Luxury Items For Greedy Kabbalah Members

Scandal Involving Crouching Tiger Actress Begs The Question Is Sex Worth $1,000,000 Per Night

Zhang Ziyi

"Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon" actress, Zhang Ziyi, is involved in a sex scandal that is the subject of a criminal probe in her native China. She stands accused of sleeping with wealthy men for $1,000,000 a go and engaging in tax evasion to hide the proceeds or her sexual affairs.

Ziyi alleged pocketed $30,000,000 from having sex with rich men. She denied the allegations of prostitution, via a statement from her publicist, which read, "It sent stone-cold chills down our spines and has left us with a feeling of deep sadness. Why should this devoted and responsible actress have to suffer this kind of slander and defamation?"

The Judiciary Report has to ask, is sex with anyone really worth $1,000,000. Is this woman's vagina lined with gold. Exactly what happened here. Why so much money for a sexual encounter (and were they allowed to write it off in their taxes - just kidding). 

In all seriousness, selling one's body for money is not right. A number of women have done this in many nations, as a way to obtain money. However, it is not appropriate and in most countries unlawful. Do not sell yourselves. You are worth more than that.

RELATED ARTICLE

Chris Brown Has A Habit Of Trolling The Streets In His Car For Women To Have Sex With

U.S. Government Violating International Agreements In The Eduardo Saverin Tax Campaign From Congress

Eduardo Saverin

This is a follow up to the articles Facebook Founder Flees America For Singapore Renouncing His U.S. Citizenship In An Emerging Pattern and U.S. Senator Schumer Speaks About Facebook Founder Like He Is A Runaway Slave For Leaving America.

The U.S. Congress, via senators Charles Schumer and Bob Casey, put on a disgraceful display last week, slamming Facebook co-founder, Eduardo Saverin for leaving America and renouncing his U.S. citizenship (well, that was before Zuckerberg and Facebook fell from grace in the company's subsequent disaster of an IPO).

Some state Saverin's departure is for tax purposes, but he firmly disagrees and has paid huge sums of money in U.S. taxes over the years. The case brings up a very serious issue, of the U.S. government willfully violating international agreements with other nations of the world, regarding taxes.

The general rule in the international community among Western nations is, if one is from another country, but working elsewhere in the world, one pays taxes to the nation one is employed in (America included). That's been the international agreement and standard for years.

Senators Charles Schumer and Bob Casey

However, the U.S. government, via Congress and the IRS, are violating this existing, important agreement, via newfangled legislation, filled with double speak on paper, in attempts at taking the lion's share of taxes, from former and current American citizens that have left the country and are employed elsewhere. Such conduct is duplicitous and dishonest. Not to mention outrageously greedy towards Americans.

It also poses a problem for American expatriates, if the U.S. Congress continues to march any further into international illegality in said maneuvers, via greedily and spitefully trying to bankrupt people that have left America and now work and live elsewhere, via double taxation (taxes in two countries).

To enforce the aforementioned illegal double taxation, Congress and the IRS, may resort to criminal extraditions to vindictively snatch back Americans working and living abroad, for not paying taxes in America, in addition to their new nations. This would mean they would be working with no money to show for it, being illegally forced to pay taxes in two countries.

Ultimately, it will trigger a pattern of certain nations legislatively cancelling their extradition treaties with the U.S. government, over abuses thereof for financial gain in the tax realm. This would become a doubleedged sword for Washington, as people abroad accused of serious crimes regarding America, would never face justice in the States. What you will also see is creative and financial geniuses fleeing or not coming to America with their ideas and investments, in favor of living and working in countries with no extradition treaties with the United States.

U.S. Senator Schumer Speaks About Facebook Founder Like He Is A Runaway Slave For Leaving America

Barack Obama and Democrats harassing Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin for peacefully leaving America

In an appallingly disgraceful display from a lawmaker in the U.S. Congress, Senator Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, slammed Brazilian born Facebook founder, Eduardo Saverin, for renouncing his acquired American citizenship and moving to Singapore. Saverin immigrated to America from Brazil with his wealthy family as a teenager. The family lived in Miami, Florida for years and Saverin became a U.S. citizen in 1998. He renounced his U.S. citizenship on April 30, 2012.

Schumer spoke of Saverin in terms that one would think the tech genius is a runaway slave that needed to be retrieved or punished, as a headline correctly summed it up as, "Dem senators introduce bill to punish Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin." How vindictive and vile.

Is his name Kunta Kinte Saverin. Did Mr. Schumer and the senator that cosponsored the bill, Democrat, Bob Casey, buy Saverin at a slave auction, thus making him their property, to do as they command. When you bark about people in those terms and from the U.S. Congress of all places, that's the impression in gives.

Let's get something straight. You didn't make Saverin or anyone else - God did. Voluntarily come down off your high horse before God does it for you.

What's ironic is Saverin has created more jobs in America with his intellectual property (Facebook) than Schumer or Casey have or ever will. Saverin has put more money via taxes into the U.S. Treasury than Schumer or Casey have or ever will. So if one is to judge who is a great American based on how much taxes they pay, which is basically what Schumer and Casey's proposed bill is implying, Saverin would rank very high and they would rank quite low.

Schumer referred to Saverin's departure as something that is apart of a "despicable trend." You know what the Judiciary Report thinks is a "despicable trend"? The obscene amount of money Congress and Obama Administration keeps spending in taxpayer money, with squat to show for it. But I digress...

Eduardo Saverin peacefully and quietly left America two weeks ago for "personal reasons" and is being attacked for it by the Obama Administration, Congress and some in the press. Why all the ruckus. Let the man be.

If Congress thinks people leaving America is a "despicable trend" the legislature needs to look itself in the mirror and ask why people are doing so. Currently, the Obama Administration has and continues to abuse its powers at the FBI, SEC and IRS, to unlawfully harass and punish people and companies that do not sing the praises of Barack Obama, which is corrupt and unconstitutional. I ask you, how does such misconduct make America better or stronger. It has made the nation weaker and poorer.

Schumer and Casey's bill is another abusive move in that same vein. Sponsoring a vindictive, mean, slavetrader sounding congressional bill, is not going to stop anyone from leaving America, nor will it entice future businessmen and women to come to the country with their ideas and investments, as the Saverins, among others, did years ago.

They will look at how Saverin and others are being treated for expanding their horizons and living in a different part of the world and opt against going to or investing in America. They will forgo the nation, thinking to themselves, if at any time I choose to live somewhere else, I will be vindictively maligned in public and maliciously pursued by the U.S. government, seeking to harm me for a peaceful, personal choice. That's a risk most will not want to take.

What is being said about Saverin and the vengeful actions being taken, because he as a human being with rights, chose to freely move about the world, is disgraceful. Saverin and others are crazily being punished by a group of arrogant senators, acting like their personal slave property ran away. It is not Congress' finest hour. It is one of its worst.

Schumer and Casey are acting like a boyfriend after a break-up with a girl that has moved on. It's the equivalent of Schumer and Casey chasing Saverin down the street and into the airport screaming, "You can't quit me" and "I'll get you for this."

Mark Zuckerberg

I find it odd that Mr. Schumer and Mr. Casey think threatening, bullying and barking foul legislation at someone from the floor of Congress is going to make them want to stay. If anything, it would reaffirm a person's decision to leave. What's next with Congress, will certain senators do what Hollywood has done in maliciously, fraudulently, crazily and obsessively filing a lawsuit over a person lawfully leaving America (yes, they've done that in another case, but more on that in another article to be published shortly).

Some are describing Saverin's departure as a tax dodge. However, the reported "$67,000,000" in taxes he allegedly dodged is nothing to Saverin, who is worth $3 billion dollars (Saverin only owns 4% of Facebook, after being robbed by greedy, disgraceful Mark Zuckerberg, as seen in the movie "The Social Network").

Saverin stated of his move to Singapore, "I did not think once about my position related to tax savings. The whole idea that that was important to me or part of my consideration is not accurate...simplicity of focus so that my time and efforts can be spent on what matters to me. If I chose to open a bank account locally in Singapore, most of the banks would not accept me in having a fully functional bank account."

Saverin lists his departure as one based in "personal reasons." If you watched the movie "The Social Network" you really shouldn't be surprised he left. I can't imagine the nasty, horrible, contentious, corrupted legal battle and the foul, disdainful way Saverin was treated by crook Mark Zuckerberg, didn't weight on his decision to depart. That whole experience would leave a bad taste in anyone's mouth. Life is too short to have one's quality of life drained by such terrible events. No amount of money can compensate for that.

"The Social Network" movie

Zuckerberg is a little thief and he needs to stop pretending he is otherwise. He stole the idea for Facebook from the Winklevoss twins, then Suckerberg as he is called by some online, suckered Saverin, his roommate, into giving him money ($30,000) and his mathematical code (algorithm) to build the site that became Facebook.

Saverin's algorithm was invaluable to Facebook, because Zuckerberg couldn't get the site to work without. Saverin brought a lot to the table in intellectual property and via funding the project now known as Facebook. Congress owes him some gratitude for the jobs and international acclaim Facebook has created, not the unhinged contempt of a group of vengeful senators, disgracing the legislature.

Saverin and the Winklevoss twins are the parents of the baby that is Facebook. Zuckerberg is the nurse that helped to deliver the baby, who then stole it. By right and under the law, he should be in prison for what he did, as it constituted criminal copyright infringement, fraud, bank fraud, grand theft larceny, conspiracy to defraud and racketeering, among other charges.

Zuckerberg is a glorified webmaster. Webmastering is a job I've done for 11-years, so I know it when I see it. At most Zuckerberg should have been given a set fee of a few thousand dollars for designing the website Facebook that was someone else's idea, project and computer code. When you look at Google, it is a detailed algorithm that is worth billions. Much like Saverin's algorithm is worth billions, all of which he has not received after being ripped off by Zuckerberg.

What makes a great site is the idea behind it and its contents, not necessarily the aesthetic design by the webmaster. There are some sites that are great to look at, but that's all you do and don't visit often, because its contents is airheaded and boring (some of you know men and women like that as well).

Then there are other sites that have a basic design without all the bells and whistles, but the idea and content causes you to visit often. Look at Drudge Report. The design is pretty basic, downright archaic, but the idea behind it and contents are what made it a hit. But I digress again...

Charles Schumer and Bob Casey

In the end, Saverin and the Winklevoss twins got screwed out of 99% of what was due to them, tens of billions of dollars, while that little weasel Zuckerberg goes around the world taking full credit and most of the money, $20 billion dollars, for something he stole, Facebook.

Zuckerberg is one of the biggest thieves in history and has been recorded as such thanks to "The Social Network." That's one of the great things about film. It immortalizes a story for everyone to see indefinitely. The Facebook story is and continues to be a great injustice that needs to be corrected.

Saverin was robbed of tens of billions of dollars and now Congress is forming legislation to try and rip him off some more, after all he did for America and after the unconscionable things Zuckerberg did to him. Zuckerberg didn't make Saverin rich, it's the other way around. Saverin's family already had money when they came to America and now Congress is trying to take as much of that money as possible.

Something has profoundly gone wrong in the system. The government needs to stop whining about people leaving and ask itself what in the legal system and legislature is causing such things to happen, regarding people leaving, seeking other places to live and do business. Congress and the Obama Administration know the answer. They are just too embarrassed and ashamed to admit they are a big part of the problem.
But go ahead with the acts of malice, as the nation and world are watching and shall judge you by it forever. So shall God.

Has Obama Learned Heads Of State Can't Be Too Friendly With The Business Sector

Barack Obama

President Barack Obama is learning the hard way that heads of state can't be too friendly with the business sector, as economic numbers continue to worsen. Some businesspeople and companies are decent. However, some are not and those are the ones that will take you for a chump they can use as they see fit, for being too friendly, which they interpret as weakness and vulnerability.

After almost 3 and 1/2 years in office, the Obama Administration has failed to fix the U.S. economy, that was decimated by former president, George W. Bush. Obama's spending without increased taxation on the rich, made matters worse. Now the nation has the biggest deficit in its history and is hemorrhaging money at a drastic rate.

The Judiciary Report tried to help Obama with published suggestions on the site, from the minute he assumed office, to help dig America out of the hole Bush dropped the nation in via excessive spending. The site recommended, among other things, raising taxes on the rich, budget cuts via eliminating wasteful government projects, avoiding costly newfangled tech spending (solar) until things were on firm financial footing regarding the Treasury and small salary and expense cuts to high ranking and mid-level members of government.

Obama did none of it, believing it was best to attempt the risky maneuver of spending money to make money and it failed. The president made a costly bet that did not pay off. He let the corporate sector grab his ear and befriend him, to do their bidding in the advancement of their personal, offshore hidden wealth, but it damaged the economy in the process. America has not benefited from these policies.

RELATED ARTICLES

Obama Associate Hilary Rosen Slams Mitt Romney's Wife Ann Romney Leading To Controversy In The Press And Online

Polls Concur Republican Candidates Are Rating More Favorably With The Public Than President Obama

Mitt Romney Is Accusing President Barack Obama Of Driving Up Gas Prices To Get Americans Off Oil